Prophet Muhammad
(PBUH) The JUST
By reading
closely the Prophet Muhammad’s speeches, it is apparent that he believed in
justice for all humanity. He
embodied the commandment of the Qur’an:
0
you who believe! Stand out firmly for Allah, as witnesses to fair dealing, and
let not the hatred and enmity of others make you swerve to wrong and depart from
justice. Be just: that is next to piety: and fear Allah. (Qur’an,
5:9).
Textual analysis of his speeches also revealed he did not even
discriminate between a near relative and a stranger in these matters; if the
stranger was in the right, he decreed against his relative and in favor of the
stranger.
Once
a noble woman of the Quraish committed theft.
Her relatives tried to intercede on her behalf. The Prophet called the
people and addressed them in these words: “What destroyed your predecessors
was just that when a person of rank among them committed a theft (or any crime),
they left him alone, but when a weak one of their number committed a theft (or
any crime), they inflicted the prescribed punishment on him. I swear by Allah
that if Fatimah, daughter of Muhammad, should steal. I would have her hand cut
off.” (Bukhari, 6787)
This strict fairness of the Prophet in matters of disputes and crimes was
in line with the commandment of the Qur’an not to distinguish between a
relative and a stranger in matters of justice: “Whenever you speak, speak
justly and fairly, even if a near
relative is concerned; and fulfill the Covenant of Allah. Thus, does Allah
Command you that you may remember and heed” (Qur’an 6: 152).
And again, in Surah Nisa we
read:
O
you who believe! Stand out
firmly for justice as witnesses to Allah, even as
against yourselves, or your parents, or you’re near relatives, and whether
it be against rich or poor. For Allah can best protect both. Follow not the
lusts (of your hearts), lest you swerve (from doing justice), and if you distort
(justice) or decline to do justice, surely Allah is well-acquainted with all
that you do. Qur’an, 4:135)
The Prophet firmly established the rule of justice among his people by
his own example and practice. When he was on his deathbed, just a few moments
before he breathed his last breath, he had it
publicly announced:
Is
there anyone among you whom I have stricken? Here is my back, let him strike me
in return. Is there anyone whose character I have defamed or insulted? Let him
now cast reproach upon me. Is there anyone from whom I have taken anything
unjustly? Let him now come forward and be indemnified.
(Rahaman, Encyclopaedia of Seerah, Vol.III, London, 1994, P.164)
Such
was his consciousness and understanding of the rights of other people, and of
the need to dispense them with absolute fairness and justice that he did not
forget it even at the time of his last breath. This is an ever-living reminder
to the Muslims of the great importance of fairness and justice. It is an
obligation of the Muslims first to Allah, who gave them a Code of Law concerning
the determining of the rights of the people with full justice, and second to the
Prophet, who, by his strict adherence to the rule of law, firmly established
this principle among them and warned them never to relax its enforcement.
The
analysis demonstrates that he was a very fair and just man and succeeded not
only in establishing a very high standard of justice but also in setting a code
of law that helped to establish and strengthen the rule of law in a country
wherein before there had been neither any rule of law nor any respect for law or
justice. He so firmly established a system of justice in the country and so
firmly and deeply engraved it in the hearts of his people that they truly became
the messengers of justice for the oppressed people of the world. Their quality
of fairness and goodness is mentioned by the Qur’an in these words: “You are
the best of peoples, raised for mankind, enjoining what is right and fair,
forbidding what is wrong, and
believing in Allah” (Qur’an 3:110). This goes to prove the point that the
Prophet did not welcome discrimination of any kind.
The
standard of the Prophet’s concept of justice was so exalted that he could not
tolerate any kind of discrimination between man and man on the basis of color,
creed, race, nationality, language, birth or status where it came to judging
disputes between them. It was a
universal code of law that exceeded the barriers of time and space and applied
equally to all races and all nations. As time went by people unconsciously
welcomed this code of law not knowing that it was Prophet Muhammad who gave it
birth.
The Qur’an laid the fundamental basis
of human honor and status in these words:
0
mankind! We created you from a single (pair) of a male and a female, and made
you into nations and tribes, that you may know each other (not that you may
despise each other). Surely the most honored of you in the Sight of Allah is (he
who is) the most righteous of you. (Qur’an, 49:13)
The following sayings of Prophet Muhammad show how dedicated he was to
justice: “No judge should give judgment between two people when he is
angry.” (Bukhari, 6158). This means that it was practically impossible to
bring about justice in a mindset where emotions override one’s reason.
If
anyone seeks the office of judge among the Muslims and when he gets it and if
his justice prevails over his tyranny, he will go to
This can clearly be understood as paying the rightful debt when one
fails to allow reason to govern his/her decision. Tyrannical ruling is
synonymous to emotional ruling. He emphasized the idea of going to hell when one
wrongfully decides:
Judges
are of three types, one of which will go to
Hell now becomes a symbol of retribution. If anyone wants to escape the
wrath of Allah, he has to take rightful decision and not by a tyrant as Tirmidhi
(2000) confirms:
“Allah is
with the judge as long as he is not tyrannical, but when he is tyrannical, Allah
departs from him and the devil attaches himself to him” (Tirmidhi, 1330).
The seriousness of the functions of a judge and wrongness of submitting false evidence is shown by the following hadith of the Prophet. It is reported that two men brought a dispute before the Prophet about inheritance, but neither of them had any proof beyond their claim. The Prophet, while giving judgment in this case, said:
If I give a judgment in favor of one respecting what is rightly his brother’s, I am allotting him only a portion of Hell.” Thereupon, both the persons said: “Messenger of Allah, this right of mine may go to my brother” but he replied: “No, rather go and divide it up, aiming at what is right; then draw lots, and let each of you consider the other to have what is legitimately his. ( Bukhari, 6967)
The Qur’an refers to bringing false evidence before the judge in these words: “Do not usurp one another’s property by unjust means, nor offer it to the judges, so that you may devour, knowingly and unjustly, a portion of the goods of others” (Qur’an, 2:188). It was by means of these severe restrictions and warnings of the Qur’an regarding false evidence and bribery and the very clear, fair and just treatment of the Prophet that the people came to respect the law of Islam. This means that Prophet Muhammad was not ready to discriminate. He treated everyone as equally important as any other. He was only ready to be an impartial judge in the face of disputes but this did not mean that anyone was allowed to being false in denial before him and expected to get a good judgment. Prophet Muhammad always decided each case on the basis of the evidence, or, in the absence of evidence, the parties were asked to take an oath. Then he gave his judgment according to the Commandment of Allah in that respect:
I am only a human being and you bring your disputes to me, some perhaps being more eloquent in their arguments than others, so that I may give judgment on their behalf it is what I hear from them. Therefore, Whatever I decide for anyone which by right belongs to his brother, he must not take it, for I am granting him only a portion of hell. (Bukhari, 7181)
By doing this, Prophet Muhammad was interested in striking a balance. He did not see himself trying to favor one party as against the other. Equality of humankind was one of his prime objectives.